Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions - How To


How do I set Phase Start dates?

Phase start dates, duration, and effort settings are used to configure the lifecycle model to your development methods and practices.  Select Estimate | Solution Assumptions from the main menu, then select the Phase Tuning tab.  The start date for the first phase included in the project is the project start date specified on the Solution Assumptions Basic Info tab or via Solution Wizards.

Subsequent phases can be set to begin at:

  • Ratio - a specific percentage of the prior phase’s duration (most common)
  • Fixed Overlap - a specified number of months into the prior phase
  • Specific Date - a specific date.

Select Tuning Factor History... to use phase tuning data from select completed projects loaded in your SLIM-Estimate workbook.


















Taxonomy upgrade extras 
SLIM-Estimate How To


How can I change the unit for Total system size in the Balanced Risk and other solution wizards? Currently it is set to IU, but we use Function Points.

Solution wizards that require a size estimate assumption use the Sizing By History technique to obtain an initial "ballpark" estimate based on the statistical size ranges, or t-shirt sizes, in your project's associated trend group(s).  This technique uses the Function Unit and Gearing Factor in the Project Environment settings.  Most of the templates installed with SLIM-Suite have the Function Unit set to the Base Size Unit, either IU or SLOC.  

To change the Function Unit to Stories, Features, Function Points, or other size unit, select Tools | Customize Project Environment from the menu. On the Project Description Tab, there is a Function Unit list box.  Select Function Points or other unit, then enter an appropriate Gearing Factor to represent the average number of Base Size Units (elementary programming steps) contained in your selected  Function Unit (ex.: a gearing factor of 50 represents 50 Base Size Units per Function Point).  

If you need help determining an appropriate gearing factor, visit the Function Point Gearing Factors page on the QSM web site, download our Gearing Factors whitepaper, or contact QSM for assistance.


Taxonomy upgrade extras 
SLIM-Estimate How To Sizing Tips & Tricks

View the Reports and Graphs Export Table to see the best way to get SLIM-Suite reports and graphs into other applications.


There's a good fit between my total defect data and the plan but in the defects by category charts, the defect actuals for each category aren't tracking the plan very well. How can I fix this?

Chances are your defect category percentages need to be adjusted. To tune these percentages using your actual data, create a Multi-Metric Time Series Chart and insert a QSM Tracked Defects Category Total (Actual) metric for each defect category you're tracking:

 Multi-Metric chart

Next, right click on your chart to access the chart property tabs. On the Data tab, select "Percent of first metric's data points" and click OK to exit the dialog.

Data Tab

Next, toggle your Multi-Metric chart into report form:

Defect chart

If the weekly or monthly values seem fairly consistent, you can simply use the latest % of total for each category. If you see a lot of variation, you may want to average the values - don't be afraid to experiment until you get the best visual fit! Enter the % for each category on the Reliability tab of the Project Environment dialog:

Reliability Tab

Once you return to the defects by category views, you should see a better fit between the plan and actuals.


My current plan is extremely inconsistent with my actual data. For instance, the project started a year late and has already slipped by almost 15 months.  Using my original plan, the actual defect data yields a defect tuning factor of 2000% when I run the Defect Tuning Calculator function. 

Is the plan being factored into the defect tuning calculations? If so, can significant variation between the plan and the actuals result in an incorrect tuning factor?

When looking for the best tuning factor, SLIM-Control must make some assumptions in order to generate a set of theoretical defect curves and find the one that best fits your actual data. If these assumptions are incorrect (for example, if either the expected phase 3 duration or expected effort are wrong) then any calculations based on these assumptions will be affected. 

Defect Tuning Factor

Before running the Defect Tuning Calculator, it’s a good idea to review the current plan to ensure reasonable consistency with your actual data. If your actuals have diverged significantly from the current plan, it should be updated before defect tuning is performed. To update the current plan, run a forecast, make the forecast the current plan, then re-run the Defect Tuning Calculator. 

Taxonomy upgrade extras 
SLIM-Control Defects (MTTD) How To


I sometimes get poor defect curve fits when running a forecast.  What can I do to improve this?

Getting a good curve fit is important - the poorer the fit, the less confidence you will have in the projected new time for that set of data. The goodness of fit is particularly important during the latter stages of Phase 3 because defect data is weighted more heavily at that time. There are two things you can do to improve your defect curve fits:

1.  Assess the reliability of early data points carefully. If you have little confidence in the earliest defect data, you should throw it out. Our theoretical defect data curve algorithm assumes defects are being captured from the start of Phase 3 in a consistent and systematic manner. In practice, however, systematic logging of defects is often not performed until around Systems Integration Test (71% of phase 3 duration). If your early defect data is very erratic, chances are those data points are unreliable. If you know (or suspect) this to be the case, exclude the unreliable data points from curve fitting and forecasting. Unreliable data introduces random noise into SLIM-Control's calculations and creates unreliable forecasts.

2.  Try to determine the best tuning factor for your defect data. This is fairly easy to do once any early noisy data points have been discarded. There are two ways to get a handle on the defect tuning factor.  You can use either one, or combine the two methods:

  • The first method uses past projects to generate a historic defect tuning factor. You can use any similar projects captured in SLIM-DataManager. Individual defect tuning factors for each project can be displayed on DataManager’s Project List View by selecting Tools | Customize View Layout from the menu. To get the average Defect Tuning Factor for one or more completed projects, import them into SLIM-Control using the History | Load Projects menu item and then run the Defect Tuning Calculator.  If you plan on using an average DTF from your history, you may wish to inspect the data and eliminate outliers to prevent distortion of the average.
  • Once you have entered at least three actual total defect data points into SLIM-Control the Defect Tuning Calculator can also calculate a defect tuning factor from your actual defect data.

Once the expected defect total has been tuned to your history or actual data, you should see an improvement in your defect curve fits. If you’re tracking Defects Found by Category, here's one final step that will help ensure optimal curve fits:

  • Tune the % of total defects for each category using your actual data. For more information on how to do this, see the FAQ entitled, "How Do I Tune My Defect Category Percentages?".

If you are still getting poor data fits after performing the steps outlined above, either try to determine the reasons or simply exclude defect data from the forecast curve fit.

Taxonomy upgrade extras 
SLIM-Control Defects (MTTD) How To

I’d like my MTTD forecasts to reflect the number of test hours for each reporting period. How do I do this in SLIM-Control?

The Weighted MTTD option allows you to account for the actual hours spent testing each reporting period. Often the number of test hours fluctuates from month to month, causing large swings or "find and fix cycles" as test effort is directed to finding defects one period, then drops off as effort goes into fixing newly discovered defects during the next period. Using the Weighted MTTD option will smooth out these "find and fix" cycles, giving you a smoother defect curve.  Be sure to click the box at the top of the Metric Definitions dialog box in order to display both active and inactive metrics.

To use the Weighted MTTD metric, you must activate it by choosing Tools | Customize Metric Definitions from the menu. Locate the active defect metrics folder (Hint: the folder title will be bolded). If you don't see the metric, make sure you are displaying all active and inactive metrics. Scroll down and select the Weighted MTTD metric, then click the Edit Metric button:

Metric Definitions

Activate the metric by checking the “Active” checkbox and click OK to exit.

Custom Metric Definitions

Next, activate the QSM Test folder. Note the lack of bold type – this category is inactive by default. Select the folder title and activate the category using the Edit Category button:

Metric Category Definition

Click OK to save your changes and exit the Metrics Definitions dialogs.

The number of testing hours per reporting period should now appear on the Metrics tab of the Actual Data screen (select Control | Actual Data from the menu). As with all custom metrics, the testing hours field is appended to the list of standard metrics so you will need to scroll down to the bottom of the metric list to see the Test Hours field. This is where you will enter the actual hours spent testing for each reporting period.

Taxonomy upgrade extras 
SLIM-Control Defects (MTTD) How To